Ratio Decidendi, Agreement, Againts The Decision of MA No. 601K/PDT/2015 in The Case of Agreements that do not use Indonesian

Authors

  • Jeremy Emmanuel Purba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.517-524

Keywords:

ratio decidendi, judge’s decision, agreement, investment

Abstract

The Supreme Court's decision in the case of an agreement between investors who enter into an agreement using English is contrary to the agreement of the parties. Changes to the agreement may be detrimental to investors in Indonesia, who must amend the agreement previously made in English. The research method based on the data needed in this research is secondary data obtained through literature study in the form of laws and descriptive analysis, namely analyzing the laws and regulations. The loan agreement between PT. BKP and Nine AM, Ltd. should not be null and void. The judge's interpretation of a lawful cause is wrong because a lawful cause refers the contents of the loan agreement. The government should be firm in determining a sanction if there is a violation of the law. This is intended so that judges are not wrong in applying regulations so that they do not produce decisions that can harmcertain parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ary Zulfikar, Hukum Penanaman Modal: Kebijakan Pembatasan Modal Asing Kajian Pemanfaatan Arus Moda Asing untuk Penguatan Struktur Ekonomi Kerakyatan, Bandung: Keni Media, 2019

Edy Wibowo, Mengapa Putusan Pemidanaan Hakim Cenderung Lebih Ringan daripada Tuntutan, Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan Edisi No. 257 Bulan April 2007, Ikahi, Jakarta, 2007

Herlien Budiono, Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian dan Penerapannya di Bidang Kenotariatan, Cet. III, Bandung: CitraAditya Bakti, 2011

Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih, Kausa yang Halal dan Kedudukan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019

Kusnowibowo, Hukum Investasi Internasional, Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2018

Muhaimin, Penetapan Tersangka Tidak Ada Batas Waktu, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Volume 20 No. 2 Juni 2020. Hlm. 276

Rahmi Jened. Teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Investasi Langsung (Direct Investment), Jakarta: Kencana, 2016

Salim H.S., Hukum Kontrak (Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak), Cet. XIV, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019

Sentosa Sembiring, Hukum Investasi, Bandung: NuansaAulia, 2018

Siti Anisah & Lucky Suryo Wicaksono, Hukum Investasi, Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2017

Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian, Cet. XIII, Jakarta: Intermasa, 1991

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar,Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2001

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Purba, J. E. (2021). Ratio Decidendi, Agreement, Againts The Decision of MA No. 601K/PDT/2015 in The Case of Agreements that do not use Indonesian. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(4), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.517-524

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.