Transformasi Proses Penyidikan Oleh Kepolisian  Berdasarkan Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana

Ayu Putriyana; Yuliana

doi:10.30641/dejure.2026.V26.109-126

Authors

Ayu Putriyana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu
Yuliana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2026.V26.109-126

Abstract

Reforms in criminal justice system policies are a fundamental basis for Indonesian society, because previous policies are no longer relevant to current legal phenomena. This article analyzes the transformation of the investigation process by comparing the regulations in the 1981 Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the New Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and examines the challenges of their implementation. This research uses a normative juridical research method with a descriptive qualitative approach, conducted through a literature review of regulations, doctrines, and relevant legal literature. The research results show that the reform of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) brings significant paradigm shifts toward due process of law, including the affirmation of a minimum standard of two pieces of evidence in the determination of suspects, the strengthening of suspects' rights from the early stages of investigation, the obligation of legal assistance, the expansion of oversight mechanisms, and the recognition of electronic evidence. However, implementing the new Criminal Procedure Code faces various challenges, including regulatory disharmony, limitations in implementing regulations, the readiness of institutions and law enforcement officers, and disparities in technological resources across regions. Therefore, the success of the investigation transformation highly depends on the consistency in officers, the formulation of derivative regulations, strengthening law enforcement officers' capacity, and changing the legal culture so that procedural justice can be effectively realized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahwan, and Nunung Rahmania. “Upaya Paksa Dalam RUU KUHAP: Perspektif Model Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum 10, no. 2 (2025).

Al-Harbi, N., N. Al-Omari, and S. Al-Yami. “Rights of People with Special Needs from a Legal Perspective.” International Journal of Law Research and Studies, 2024, 8–18.

Alimudin, Galu Cika. “Kontroversi KUHAP Terbaru : Perbandingan Kewenangan Jaksa Dan Kepolisian Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa 3, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61722/jipm.v3i3.949.

Aziz, Abdul, and Taun. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Tersangka Dalam Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 7 (2024): 90. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v7i1.90-101.

Bergmann, Rafael Alfredo, Altje Agustin Musa, and Nurhikmah Nachrawy. “Analisis Hukum Mengenai Prosedur Penyidikan Dan Penetapan Tersangka Dalam Kasus Pembunuhan.” Lex Crimen Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UNSRAT 13, no. 3 (2025).

Bondar, Tatiana Ivanovna, Alexey Yurievich Molyanov, Taulan Osmanovich Boziev, Nikolay Nikolaevich Bukharov, and Alexandr Vladimirovich Shakhmatov. “Observance Of Human Rights And Freedoms In The Implementation Of Intelligence-Gathering A Observância Dos Direitos Humanos E Das Liberdades Na Implementação Da Coleta De Informações.” Rev. Quaestio Iuris 15 (2022): 771–86. https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2022.66325.

Christanto, Yogi Natanael. Kesenjangan Penerapan Pidana Mati Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Indramayu: Adab, 2023.

Darmansyah, Erick, and Wilma Silalahi. “Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.5. No.7 (2024) Tema/Edisi : Hukum Pidana (Bulan Ketujuh) Https://Jhlg.Rewangrencang.Com/.” Rewang Rencang 5, no. 7 (2024): 1–14.

Dewi, Ikama, Setia Triana, Muhammad Yusril Irza, and Arif Awaludin. “Reformasi KUHAP Dalam Membangun Sistem Peradilan Pidana Yang Berkeadilan Dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Al Zayn Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Hukum 3, no. 6 (2025): 8293–8304.

Handoko, Heru Pujo. “Pergeseran Wewenang Polri Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja (Omnibus Law) Dalam Perspektif Tugas Kepolisian.” Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian 16 (2022): 208–28.

Handoko, Priyo, and Anis Farida. “Konsep Miranda Rule Dalam Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Perspektif Maqasid AlShari’ah.” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 2021, 389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.15642/aj.2021.7.2.386-408.

Hasibuan, Khairuddin, Budi Sastra Panjaitan, and Arifuddin Muda Harahap. “RUU KUHAP : Tantangan Dan Harmonisasi Antara Asas Due Process of Law Dan Criminal Justice System Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora 3, no. 2 (2024): 57.

Hibbitt, S, and G. Shaw. Initial Stages of an Investigation. In S. Hibbitt & G. Shaw, Blackstone’s Crime Investigators’ Handbook. Oxford University Press., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780192867896.003.0004.

Hidayatulloh, Syarif, and Sigit Kamseno. “Peran Penyidik Dalam Menjamin Hak Tersangka : Kajian Terhadap Implementasi KUHAP.” Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Politik 2, no. 3 (2025): 306.

Ismaidar, and Wildan Fahriza. “Keterkaitan Antara Politik Hukum Pidana Dengan Politik Kriminal, Politik Hukum, Politik Penegakan Hukum Dan Politik Sosial.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 6, no. 12 (2023): 204–8.

Latif, Udin. “Diskresi Penyidik Kepolisian Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Melalui Jalur Non Litigasi.” Muadalah Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2023): 14–27.

Lazareva, V. A. “Significance of the Act of Initiation of Criminal Proceedings: What Has Changed?” Juridical Journal of Samara University 8, no. 1 (2022): 34–39. https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2022-8-1-34-39.

Marpaung, Oloan C.H. “Reposisi Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Lex Prospicit 1, no. 1 (2023): 39–52.

Nainggolan, Rizki Samuel, and Benny Sumardiana. “Pengaturan Penyadapan Oleh Penyidik Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Perspektif Rancangan Undang-Undang KUHAP.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 13, no. 10 (2025): 2299–2309.

Nazhif Ali Murtadho. “Bukti Ilegal Dalam RUU KUHAP Indonesia: Exclusionary Rules Dan Due Process of Law.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 25, no. 3 (2025): 291–308.

Noviantama, Doni, Muhammad Hanif Mahsabihul Ardhi, and Wahyu Priyanka Nata Permana. “Analisa Hukum Penetapan Tersangka Yang Didasarkan Alat Bukti Hasil Penyelidikan Oleh KPK Muhammad Hanif Mahsabihul Ardhi Wahyu Priyanka Nata Permana Deklarasi Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum , Sebagaimana Tercantum Dalam Pasal 1 Ayat ( 3 ) Undang-Undang Da.” Lex Renaissance 9 (2024): 256–81.

Nur, Muhammad Azhar, and Mustamin. “Kegagalan Asas Diferensiasi Fungsional: Transformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Berdasarkan Asas Dominus Litis Dalam RUU KUHAP.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 7, no. 1 (2025): 38–68.

Purwono, Usman Heri. “Rekonstruksi Paradigma Penyidikan Dalam Sistem Negara Hukum Pancasila Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila.” Binamulia Hukum 13, no. 2 (2024): 483–99. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.956.

Robb, L., T Candy, and F. Deane. “Regulatory Overlap: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review.” Regulation & Governance, 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12504.

Rochman, M, Rony Wirachman, and M Iham Adepio. “Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Penegakan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menurut KUHAP Dan RUU KUHAP Di Indonesia Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei 24, no. 1 (2025): 1–21.

Rohmad, Jony Fauzur, Sjaifurrachman, and Slamet Suhartono. “Problematika Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Dalam Penerbitan Spdp Untuk Menetapkan Seseorang Sebagai Tersangka.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 12, no. 2 (2021).

Salsabila, Karina Azzahra, and Benny Sumardiana. “Analisis Terhadap Efektivitas Batas Waktu Penyidikan Dalam KUHAP Kepada Perlindungan HAM Tersangka.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 8, no. 1 (2025): 11–24.

Saputra, Eko. “RUU KUHAP : Dominasi Crime Control System Dan Ancaman Terhadap Prinsip Due Process of Law.” JIMU: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Disiplin 03, no. 03 (2025): 1708–16.

Sinaga, Japansen, Rolib Sitorus, Sryani Br Ginting, and Christina N M Tobing. “Pertentangan Kewenangan Penyadapan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia.” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 5, no. 2 (2024): 466.

Situngkir, Roman. “Urgensi Penerapan Omnibus Law Pembentukan Regulasi Di Indonesia Untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan.” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022): 1–8.

Susilo, E. “Justice Delayed, Justice Denied: A Critical Examination of Repeated Suspect Status in Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 3 (2024): 57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i3.6088.

Syahputra, Azmi. “Jaksa Dalam Pusaran KUHAP Tahun 2025: Antara Pengendali Mutu Atau Stempel Penyidikan?” Hukum Online, 2026. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/jaksa-dalam-pusaran-kuhap-baru--antara-pengendali-mutu-atau-stempel-penyidikan-lt695734ad1eb21/.

Syndo, Sivana Amanda Diamita, Safaruddin Harefa, Rifdatul Maziyyah, Nazhif Ali Murtadho, and Indy Mafiiqo Syatta. “Klitih Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Klitih Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Islam.” Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 12, no. 1 (2023): 14. https://ejurnal.umbima.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukum/article/view/83.

Wahyu, Valentino Aquila De, Aurelia Eka Junita, and Amanda Destiana. “Analisis Kinerja Penyelidikan Dan Penyidikan Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Kriminal Di Polres Karanganyar.” Aliansi Jurnal Hukum , Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2024): 51.

Wibowo, Aldo Satrio, and Benny Sumardiana. “Core Legal Challenges in Determining Locus and Tempus Delicti in Revenge Porn in Indonesia.” Reformasi Hukum, 2025, 22–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1165.

Zahara, Penti, and Syamsir. “Analisis Terhadap Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 6 Tahun 2010 Oleh Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil.” Limbago: Journal Of Constitutional Law 1, no. 3 (2021): 419–30.

Zahrulswendar, Indra Hafit. “Praperadilan Dan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Sebagai Sarana Kontrol Upaya Paksa Terhadap Tersangka Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2022.