Multi-Actor Creator Liability in AI-Generated Works: A Normative Framework for Indonesian Copyright Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2026.V26.169-180Abstract
This study examines the legal status of authorship and liability mechanisms for AI-generated works within the framework of Indonesian positive law, analyzed comparatively with international regulations. Using a normative-juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, supported by statutory analysis, legal doctrines, and international practices, the findings confirm that artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be qualified as a legal subject because it lacks legal capacity and moral consciousness. Consequently, legal responsibility remains with humans, creators, programmers, or system controllers, through the principle of creator liability. The novelty of this research lies in the normative reconstruction that positions creator liability as the primary mechanism of accountability in revising Indonesia’s Copyright Law, while introducing the concept of multi-actor liability. This framework emphasizes that responsibility is not confined to a single party but can be distributed among programmers, system operators, and corporations utilizing AI. Such an approach strengthens legal certainty while providing a futuristic framework that is adaptive to technological disruption, balancing certainty, justice, and utility. In practical terms, this study offers recommendations for regulators to design policies responsive to digital transformation and provides guidance for the creative industry to ensure the fair distribution of economic benefits and the protection of moral rights. Regulations affirming humans as the principal legal subjects will prevent normative gaps, safeguard moral integrity, and guarantee equitable distribution of economic rights. Thus, this research contributes to strengthening Indonesia’s legal system to uphold certainty, justice, and utility in the digital era, while positioning the country within the global discourse on futuristic law and copyright protection in the age of AI.
Downloads
References
Avery JJ, Abril PS and Riego A del, ‘Attributing AI Authorship: Towards a System of Icons for Legal and Ethical Disclosure’ (2024) 22 Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property <https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol22/iss1/1/>
Bang J, ‘Regulatory Governance of AI in the Generative AI Era: A Comparative Study of South Korea’s AI Basic Act and the EU AI Act for Sustainable Digital Transformation’ (2026) 15 Laws <https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15030042>
Buick A, ‘Copyright and AI Training Data—Transparency to the Rescue?’ (2025) 20 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 182 <https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpae102>
Chesterman S, ‘Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of Legal Personality’ (2020) 69 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 819 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589320000366>
Ebers M and Navas S, Algorithms and Law ((Cambridge University Press 2020) <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108670820>
Fenwick M and Vermeulen EPM, ‘Technology and Corporate Governance: Blockchain, Crypto, and Artificial Intelligence’ (2018) <https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3263222>
Fernandes JV, ‘Robot Citizenship and Gender (in)Equality: The Case of Sophia the Robot in Saudi Arabia’ [2022] OBERVARE <https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0122.4>
Gervais DJ, ‘The Machine as Author’ [2020] Iowa Law Review
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Edy Santoso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s). Authors agree to grant the first publication rights to Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure. The Journal embeds a simple machine-readable under Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Thus, papers in this Journal can be used freely for non-commercial purposes with the acknowledgment of authorship and publication in this journal.




