Ecosoc Rights Justiciability Thorugh Individual Communication Mechanism Under the Optional Protocol to the Icescr

Authors

  • Harison Citrawan Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2014.5.143-151

Keywords:

individual communication, justiciability, economic, social and cultural rights

Abstract

The individual communication mechanism enshrined under the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights could be regarded as a form of state's commitment to make economic, social and cultural (ecosoc) rights justiciable. This paper attempts to depict several aspects of the working mechanism of individual communication exercised by the Ecosoc Rights Committee, including: admissibility of ratione personae, ratione temporis, and ratione materiae. Furthermore, analysis will be taken on the issue of whether such a mechanism could give an effective way to promote state's compliance on ecosoc rights fulfillment. In brief, this paper concludes several points: first, the Optional Protocol is to be regarded as a compromise between the nature of the rights and the duties ruled under the Covenant; second, the Ecosoc Rights Committee shall accommodate the need of adjudicative body in order to shift the traditional view of ecosoc rights; and third, there is a need of a comprehensive coordination and cooperation amongst both treaty based and charter based human rights institutions, not only on technical issues but also on the legal interpretation method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Backer, Inge Lorange, 2009, Ideals and Implementation

- Ratifying another Complaints Procedure?, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter Vol. 27, NR 1, S. 91-

Chief Bernard Ominayak and the Lubicon Lake Band

v. Canada, Communication No. 167/1984, CCPR/ C/38/D/167/1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bupsy.1984.12658

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,

Ibid. General Comment No, 9 (1998) UN Doc. E/1999/22, Annex IV.

ECHR, Velásquez Rodríguez v Honduras Case.

Eide, Asbjorn et all, 2001, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047433866_006

Grossman, Claudio, et al. "A Festschrift in Honor of Seymour J. Rubin." American University International Law Review 10, no. 4 (1995): 1215-1274

Langford, Malcolm, 2009, Closing the Gap? An Introduction to the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter Vol.27, NR 1, S. 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-814X-2009-01-01

Porter, Bruce, The Reasonableness of Article 8 (4) - Adjudicating Claims from the Margins, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter Vol. 27, NR 1, S. 39-53, hlm.40-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-814X-2009-01-03

Scheinin, Martin et all, 2009, Evolution or Revolution? Extrapolating from the Experience of the Human Rights Committee, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter Vol.27, NR 1, S. 97-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-814X-2009-01-08

Published

11/09/2023

How to Cite

Citrawan, Harison. “Ecosoc Rights Justiciability Thorugh Individual Communication Mechanism Under the Optional Protocol to the Icescr”. Jurnal HAM 5, no. 2 (November 9, 2023): 143–151. Accessed September 17, 2026. https://lawpolicyjournal.id/index.php/ham/article/view/4187.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.