Communicating Disability Rights: Disability and Parent Perspectives

Authors

  • Muhammad Novsyaroni Umar Discipline of Media and Communications, University of Sydney, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2025.16.211-234

Keywords:

disability, disability rights, parents of disability, Instagram

Abstract

Indonesians with disabilities experience socio-cultural problems that result in disparities in disability rights fulfilment, particularly in accessing equal education and healthcare. In response to such problems, disability activism has been undertaken, and nowadays is increasingly mediated by social media, specifically Instagram. This study intends to shine a light on individual and parental perspectives in communicating disability rights, drawing on the co-cultural communication theory, which classifies people with disabilities as a non-dominant group in society. Diverse disability stakeholders including people with disabilities and parents of children with disabilities participated in focus group discussions and semi-structured formal and informal interviews. Using digital autoethnographic methods, qualitative content analysis was also employed to examine their Instagram content on disability topics. This study focuses on how participants raise awareness of disability inclusion and communicate disability rights within the domain of education and healthcare. This study also emphasizes the efficacy of Instagram in mediating disability rights activism in Indonesia and its impact on the participants and their disability communities. The results show that while the assertive accommodation and non-assertive assimilation strategies are applicable in offline and online settings, the non-assertive accommodation strategy is particularly prevalent in enhancing digital disability representation. These collective actions contribute to advancing the fulfilment of those rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adioetomo, S. M., D. Mont, and Irwanto. “Persons with Disabilities in Indonesia: Empirical Facts and Implications for Social Protection Policies,” 2014. www.tnp2k.go.id.

Aline Shakti Franzke, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, and Charles M. Ess. “Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0 Association of Internet Researchers.” Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0, 2020. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf.

Ammari, Tawfiq, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. “Accessing Social Support and Overcoming Judgment on Social Media among Parents of Children with Special Needs,” 2014. www.aaai.org. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14503

Atmoko, Tri, and Dedi Rianto Rahadi. “Analisis Pemanfaatan Facebook Sebagai Media Promosi Produk Perumahan PT. Mandiri Agency Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19” 10 (2021): 213–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v10i1.2766

Behl, Diane, Janet Desgeorges, and Karl R White. “The Role of Family-Led Disability Organizations in Supporting Families with Hearing-Related Concerns.” Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention 1, no. 1 (2016). http://www.familyvoices.org.

Beresford, B., P. Rabiee, and P. Sloper. “Outcomes for Parents with Disabled Children.” Res. Works 3 (2007): 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2006.00008.x

Berger, C. R. Interpersonal Communication. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. New York: Routledge, 2009.

Downloads

Published

12/18/2025

How to Cite

Umar, Muhammad Novsyaroni. “Communicating Disability Rights: Disability and Parent Perspectives”. Jurnal HAM 16, no. 3 (December 18, 2025): 211–234. Accessed September 17, 2026. https://lawpolicyjournal.id/index.php/ham/article/view/5258.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.